Sunday, 29 April 2018

Antonio Tempesta’s etching, “The Roman Misled by Civilis’ Horse that He was Dead or Injured”, 1611/12



Antonio Tempesta (1555?–1630)

“The Roman Misled by Civilis’ Horse that He was Dead or Injured” (TIB title), 1611/12, possibly after Otto van Veen (1556–1629) (according to the Rijksmuseum [see RP-P-OB-37,689), plate 17 from the series of 37 plates (including the frontispiece/titlepage), “The War of the Romans Against the Batavians” (Romanorvm et Batavorvm societas), published in the first edition (1612) with Latin letterpress text verso illustrating Tacitus, "Histories", IV, 24.

Inscribed on the plate with the artist’s monogram within the image borderline: (at lower right on the weapon blade) “AT”.
Lettered below the image borderline: (in five lines of Dutch text at left) “Het secours naer by synde, de belegherde vallen wt, Civilis / valt met syn peerdt, waer door de Romeynen moet grypen, / meynende dat hy doodt oft ghequetst was. De Hollanders / vervaert zynde, vluchten, ende laten het secours in trecken.”; (center within a circle) “17”; (in five lines of Latin text at right) “Cum auxiliary haud procul abessent, obsessi portis erumpunt. / Civilis lapsu equi prostratus, creditus aut vulneratus aut / interfectus, multum suis pavoris et hostibus alacritatis / dedit. Batavi fugientes, legiones ingredi Vetera permittunt.”

(Google transl. “When the auxiliary position not far from a distance, might, in the siege the gates of the break out. / Civil horse slipped down, or believed to be wounded / killed during much of its incredible panic / her. Of the Dutch, having escaped, they allow the legions to enter the Old Camp.”

Etching on laid paper trimmed to the image borderline and backed with a support sheet.
Latin text on verso.
Size: (sheet) 16.5 x 21.1 cm
State i (of ii) Note: TIB lists this impression as “SI II” and the impressions without the Latin text verso as “SI I2”. In the second state the plate is “heavily retouched” and with “PLANCHE XVII / CIVILIS RENVERSÉ DE CHEVAL” lettered above the image borderline (amongst other changes).

TIB 35 (17).576 (145) (Sebastian Buffa (ed.) 1984, “The Illustrated Bartsch: Antonio Tempesta: Italian Masters of the Sixteenth Century”, vol. 35, Abaris Books, New York, p. 305); Bartsch XVII.145.576 i/ii (Adam von Bartsch 1803, “Le Peintre graveur,” Vienna); Nagler XVIII.179.560-.595 (G K Nagler 1835–52, “Neus allgemeines Künstler-Lexicon” [22 vols.]).
See also the description of this print at the Rijksmuseum : http://hdl.handle.net/10934/RM0001.COLLECT.183688

Condition: superb early impression from the first state that is richly inked, crisp and well-printed with Latin letterpress text from verso faintly visible recto (as is appropriate and expected for a print from this early edition). (Note: to appreciate the quality, compare this impression with the one held by the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA): https://collections.lacma.org/node/234370). The sheet is in near faultless condition (i.e. there are no tears, holes, folds, abrasions, stains or foxing), trimmed to the image borderline and backed with a support sheet of archival (millennium quality) washi paper.

I am selling this strong lifetime impression of this magnificently etching—note the almost looming presence of the castle portrayed at the top of the composition and the very beautiful treatment of Civilis’ rearing horse (especially its mane and tail!)—for the total cost of AU$195 (currently US$147.87/EUR121.89/GBP107.33 at the time of posting this) including postage and handling to anywhere in the world.

If you are interested in purchasing this near pristine etching from the early 1600s, please contact me (oz_jim@printsandprinciples.com) and I will send you a PayPal invoice to make the payment easy.

This print has been sold


When I was piecing together the information that I had found about this print, I wondered why the Rijksmuseum had added the cautionary note to their description of the etching that its composition was “possibly” after the design of Otto van Veen—Ruben’s teacher. I can now report that I understand the museum’s reticence: according to Eckhard Leuschner’s (2007) in the catalogue raisonné for Tempesta, “none of the preparatory drawings by Van Veen has come to light” (“The Illustrated Bartsch, vol. 35, Commentary, Part 2: Antonio Tempesta”, Abaris Books, p. 103).

Another quandary worrying me was the inconsistency in the date given for the plate's execution: one auction house assigned the date as “1611”, whereas the Rijksmuseum gave the date, “1612.” Leuschner’s TIB’s account, again laid my mind to rest: “Tempesta must have finished the plates some time (perhaps a year) before the publication, since the frontispiece … carries the inscription: ‘Ant. Tempest f. Anno 1611” (ibid). Essentially, the print was published in 1612, but it is likely to have been executed a year or so before the date of publication.







No comments:

Post a Comment

Please let me know your thoughts, advice about inaccuracies (including typos) and additional information that you would like to add to any post.