Saturday, 12 August 2017

Pietro Testa’s etching, “An Allegory of Painting” (2nd impression), 1637–38


(After) Pietro Testa (1611–50)

“An Allegory of Painting”, 1637–38
Note: this is the same print held by the British Museum that TIB (vol. 45 Commentary, p. 157) describes as Copy 1 because the first line of the inscription below the image borderline ends with the words “chiamando la” while the original ends with the letters “chia.” This is also the second copy of “Allegory of Painting” that I have offered. The earlier listing (now sold) was for an impression in poor condition with restorations, while this impression is in near perfect—museum quality—condition with the full text lines and margins.

Etching on laid paper with margins and a collector’s stamp verso.
Size: (sheet) 29.4 x 34.4 cm; (plate) 27.8 x 32.7 cm
Lettered in the bottom margin with a dedication to Cardinal Franciotti and four lines of description.

Cropper 37; Bartsch 29 (see also TIB, 45 Commentary, p. 157); Bellini 5
The British Museum offers the following description of this print:
“Allegory of painting, who as an [sic] child in the centre left draws on a tablet and gazes upon nature in the centre.” (http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=1634465&partId=1&searchText=testa&page=2)

Condition: a near faultless impression in near perfect condition apart from minimal signs of handling over the centuries (i.e. there are no tears, holes, folds, abrasions, stains or foxing, but the verso shows a few minor marks and pencil notes from previous collectors).

I am selling this exceptionally rare print—so rare that the British Museum only has a very poor impression of it—for AU$360 (currently US$284.04/EUR240.41/GBP218.48 at the time of this listing) including postage and handling to anywhere in the world.

If you are interested in purchasing this important print after Testa (the original print must be so rare that it is not held in any online collection that I have found), please contact me (oz_jim@printsandprinciples.com) and I will send you a PayPal invoice to make the payment easy.


This print has been sold


From a personal standpoint, this etching is a visual crystallisation of Testa’s life in terms of what he valued and his attitude to death. What I mean by this bold assertion is that this etching celebrates the key principles that he valued and his acceptance that his work would live on despite setting himself on the dreadful trajectory of committing suicide.

Regarding Testa’s principles, he believed that the foundation to a good art education was the study of nature. Indeed, to quote from Elizabeth Cropper's (1984) “The Ideal of Painting: Pietro Testa’s Düsseldorf Notebook”, Princeton, “Testa castigates those poor teachers who tear their pupils away from the nourishing breast of Nature, feeding them instead such weak gruel that they fly into the arms of Ignorance” (p. 248; cited in Cropper [1988] “Pietro Testa”, p. 71).

Testa signifies his belief in the importance of studying nature by portraying the infants towards the centre of the composition drawing on tablets in the “proper” way. To the left of them Testa depicts a reclining figure in the act of painting with another artist behind him surveying the painter’s progress. This small interaction may be viewed as Testa’s second stage in an ideal student’s development: adding colour to drawing. Seated beside the painter is another artist who is drawing architectural elements. This component in an artist’s development is also important as Cropper (1988) points out: “Testa argues that the perfect painter must also master the principles of architecture" (p. 71).

I could keep working my way around each group of figures as each adds another dimension to Testa’s notions of ideal art practice, but the element that really catches my attention, and best summaries Testa attitude to art is shown at the lower-right corner of the composition: a man lying in a way that suggests his arms are bound behind him and beside him is a winged hourglass and a scythe. This figure is a constrained Father Time who is not able to hold his symbolic attributes. Of course, the significance of portraying time Father Time in this way—an ineffectual force that can no longer cut folk down and limit their stay in the world of the living— is that philosophically art can never die even if the artist may pass away. For me, the symbolism of this figure foreshadows Testa’s acceptance of his approaching death by suicide and the fact that we can still admire his artwork today.







No comments:

Post a Comment

Please let me know your thoughts, advice about inaccuracies (including typos) and additional information that you would like to add to any post.